Student Loan Borrower Assisstance
  • For Borrowers
    • Basics of Student Loans
      • Student Loans 101
      • Understanding Your Student Loan Situation
      • Federal Loans vs. Private Loans
    • Dealing with Student Loan Debt
      • Repaying Your Loans
      • Pausing Student Loan Payments
      • Default & Debt Collection
      • Loan Cancellation, Forgiveness & Bankruptcy
      • Private Student Loans & Other Education Debt
    • Find Help
      • Student Loan Toolkit
      • Help with Your Student Loans
      • File Complaints
      • Help Videos
      • Surviving Debt
      • Share Your Story
  • For Advocates
    • Tools & Resources to Use with Borrowers
      • Advocate Tools & Resources
      • Student Loan Law
      • Borrower Rights After the Supreme Court Ruling
      • NCLC Digital Library
    • Help with Cases
      • Case Consultation
      • Student Loan Law Listservs
      • Legal Aid Coalition
    • Trainings & Upcoming Events
      • Conference & Legal Aid Trainings
  • Updates & News
    • Student Loan Borrower News
    • Student Loan Reports, Issue Briefs, Resources
    • Subscribe
  • Our Work
    • NCLC’s Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project
    • Contact Us
    • NCLC.org

Reverse Redlining, Discrimination, and For-Profit Education

August 19, 2011

Redlining is the practice of denying credit to particular neighborhoods on a discriminatory basis.  The flip side is reverse redlining, the practice of targeting these same communities or protected classes for predatory lending.  The creditor may not even offer better terms to other borrowers, but the key element of reverse redlining is the targeting of protected racial groups, elders, and others for unusually bad credit terms.

A lawsuit filed in June 2011 brings the reverse redlining legal claims to the for-profit higher education industry.  The class action lawsuit, filed in U.S. Distrcit Court in Washington,D.C. by attorneys John Relman and Glenn Schlactus, alleges that RSHT (formerly known as Richmond School of Health and Technology) targets poor and minority students with an inferior education product.  The lawsuit alleges that the school is a sham that “exists to make money without any regard for the education its students receive in exchange.”

Reverse redlining is a very important legal claim that gained traction during the subprime mortgage crisis.  Numerous reports backed up the allegations in these lawsuits that predatory mortgage lenders were targeting minority neigborhoods and that these lenders had an unusually large share of lending in African-American and Hispanic neighborhoods.

The RSHT lawsuit highlights the dispropriate impact of abusive for-profit school practices on poor and minority students.  According to a report by the Education Trust, low-income students make up half of the enrollment at for- profit colleges and minorities comprise 37 percent.  In releasing the report, the Education Trust described for-profit education companies that “…aggressively market to low-income individuals and people of color whose dreams of a secure place in the American mainstream include a college degree. And yet these institutions do a far better job at turning a profit for stockholders than ensuring that their students graduate. And while too few of their students acquire degrees, too many end up saddled with crippling debt.”

    Recent Posts

    Do you have Parent PLUS loans? Act now to lower your payments before options disappear.
    Dec 01, 2025
    New videos to help older people with student loan debt
    Nov 25, 2025
    What’s Happening with the SAVE Plan?
    Oct 29, 2025
    National Consumer Law Center
    facebook
    linkedin
    twitter
    rss

    Student Loan Borrower Assistance is a project of the National Consumer Law Center.

    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Donate
    • Privacy Policy

    © 2025, National Consumer Law Center, Inc., All rights reserved.

    NCLC and National Consumer Law Center are registered trademarks of National Consumer Law Center, Inc.

    Sign up for our newsletter

    Subscribe